![]() Disagreements on this point are purely speculative. This claim is the most contested of the five, but still is widely agreed upon. The tomb where the crucified Jesus was buried was found empty three days later.Jesus’ brother James, a skeptic who did not believe in Jesus, also believed he encountered the resurrected Jesus and became one of the primary leaders of the Christian church in Jerusalem, and was willing to die for this belief.Paul, an enemy of Christianity who had Christians arrested and killed, also genuinely believed he encountered the resurrected Jesus to the point of changing his entire belief system and becoming a Christian missionary, also being willing to die for this belief.This fact has already been discussed in prior posts. Jesus’ disciples genuinely believed that they encountered the resurrected Jesus to the point that they were willing to die for this belief, and so were many others.No, you cannot believe that Jesus never existed or that he did not die in this manner unless you want to be deemed an eccentric Internet conspiracy theorist. Yes, scholars from all beliefs and sides of the spectrum agree on this. Yes, this is about as historically certain of a fact as we have. There are at least three facts which fit this description, and a couple of others which come close: They take the “minimal facts” approach, which is to look at only the facts about the resurrection which nearly all scholars from all perspectives agree upon, and to determine the most reasonable historical conclusion based only on those facts. Gary Habermas and Michael Licona are two scholars who have tried to limit their biases in analyzing the historicity of the resurrection of Jesus. It assumes the conclusion and tries to study the evidence in light of the conclusion instead of arriving at a conclusion based on the evidence. This is an unfortunately extremely biased approach which assumes everything and actually studies nothing. Most people, even religious scholars, simply decide in advance of any evidence that Jesus of course did not resurrect from the dead because that is simply impossible. But, of course, that’s a pretty massive claim to try and “prove” historically. But if it did happen, those claims have been backed up by the greatest piece of evidence ever recorded in history: a man rising from the dead. If it didn’t happen, the claims that Jesus made and that his disciples made about Jesus are false. Paul wrote that if the resurrection did not actually happen, the faith of all Christians is “in vain,” “worthless,” and “we are of all men most to be pitied” (1 Cor. This is where we turn our attention today. However, even though Jesus’ disciples appear to have genuinely believed in who he was and that he resurrected from the dead, many critics argue that this does not necessarily mean the event actually happened. ![]() Over the last several months, we have discovered that archaeological discoveries, claims of accurate future predictions, the credibility of Jesus’ disciples, and the reliability of the accounts written about Jesus all appear to provide evidence favouring the validity of the Bible as a collection of historical works. One claim which has not yet died down (see what I did there?). But there is one case which is still hotly contested today. Resurrections happen in Once Upon a Time, not in real life (good show, by the way). Nobody even tries to make such audacious claims because it is just way too easy to disprove a dead body with live witnesses.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |